can someone explain? is there a reason? it doesn't make much sense to me, since it's a very useful feature when you're low on time.
fella, do you really want to raise this long old debating topic?
@JASKIRATSINGH said in #2:
> fella, do you really want to raise this long old debating topic?
i do, there is not a single good argument for not making multiple premoves an option. i havent seen one. it's useful when you have little time left and are in a winning endgame.
> fella, do you really want to raise this long old debating topic?
i do, there is not a single good argument for not making multiple premoves an option. i havent seen one. it's useful when you have little time left and are in a winning endgame.
@Gentleman64 said in #3:
> i do, there is not a single good argument for not making multiple premoves an option. i havent seen one. it's useful when you have little time left and are in a winning endgame.
Ya I agree with it too...But if players were allowed for multiple premoves , ultrabullet will be total chaos.
> i do, there is not a single good argument for not making multiple premoves an option. i havent seen one. it's useful when you have little time left and are in a winning endgame.
Ya I agree with it too...But if players were allowed for multiple premoves , ultrabullet will be total chaos.
lichess.org/forum/lichess-feedback/many-premoves-at-once
lichess.org/forum/lichess-feedback/is-it-possible-to-make-more-than-1-premove
lichess.org/forum/lichess-feedback/feature-requests--preliminary-moves
lichess.org/forum/general-chess-discussion/premoves-5
lichess.org/forum/lichess-feedback/feature-request-premoves
lichess.org/forum/lichess-feedback/multi-premoves
lichess.org/forum/lichess-feedback/premove-expansion
take your pick of arguments.
lichess.org/forum/lichess-feedback/is-it-possible-to-make-more-than-1-premove
lichess.org/forum/lichess-feedback/feature-requests--preliminary-moves
lichess.org/forum/general-chess-discussion/premoves-5
lichess.org/forum/lichess-feedback/feature-request-premoves
lichess.org/forum/lichess-feedback/multi-premoves
lichess.org/forum/lichess-feedback/premove-expansion
take your pick of arguments.
@Gentleman64 said in #3:
> i do, there is not a single good argument for not making multiple premoves an option. i havent seen one. it's useful when you have little time left and are in a winning endgame.
Chess.com takes 0.1 secs per premove always lichess does not and with lag comp you could play 100 moves in 0 time or even negative time
So maybe if there was a time penalty for premoves then yes
> i do, there is not a single good argument for not making multiple premoves an option. i havent seen one. it's useful when you have little time left and are in a winning endgame.
Chess.com takes 0.1 secs per premove always lichess does not and with lag comp you could play 100 moves in 0 time or even negative time
So maybe if there was a time penalty for premoves then yes
Keyboard binding is how people do it. You can see videos on youtube. Ultrabullet is insane. If you get paired with one of these people its impossible to win.
@aarongull said in #7:
> Keyboard binding is how people do it. You can see videos on youtube. Ultrabullet is insane. If you get paired with one of these people its impossible to win.
I'm pretty sure people get banned for doing that
> Keyboard binding is how people do it. You can see videos on youtube. Ultrabullet is insane. If you get paired with one of these people its impossible to win.
I'm pretty sure people get banned for doing that
Bad reflexes happens on both sites, but the ability to win while being in 0.1 sec is Lichess-only
Your username is very ironic for what you are doing, Don't you think?
This topic has been archived and can no longer be replied to.