I'm starting to believe that it's all about the Matterhorns.
Okay, as the juror, i put forward a motion for @clousems to build a new matterhorn if found guilty
@clousems lives on and yet there is no action. Why? Why do we sit around and watch as he brings anarchy and sets back world peace?
@spinofan7 said in #33:
> ARE THEIR TWO CLOUSEMS????????????
Grammar error found: it’s actually “there”
> ARE THEIR TWO CLOUSEMS????????????
Grammar error found: it’s actually “there”
@m011235 said in #40:
> As a milder punishment, I suggest the bongcloud as a mandatory opening for the duration of 1 year, diminishable to 6 months in case of good conduct.
Isn't bongclouding the antithesis of good conduct?
> As a milder punishment, I suggest the bongcloud as a mandatory opening for the duration of 1 year, diminishable to 6 months in case of good conduct.
Isn't bongclouding the antithesis of good conduct?
@m011235 said in #40:
> Your Honour, death is never funny, though I believe in the good intentions of the prosecutor.
>
> I request a motion for a more imaginative and less terminal penalty, to be applied if, and only if, the accusee is deemed guilty after careful consideration by this distinguished jury.
>
> As a milder punishment, I suggest the bongcloud as a mandatory opening for the duration of 1 year, diminishable to 6 months in case of good conduct.
My alternate account uses the hammerschlag as a near mandatory opening.
> Your Honour, death is never funny, though I believe in the good intentions of the prosecutor.
>
> I request a motion for a more imaginative and less terminal penalty, to be applied if, and only if, the accusee is deemed guilty after careful consideration by this distinguished jury.
>
> As a milder punishment, I suggest the bongcloud as a mandatory opening for the duration of 1 year, diminishable to 6 months in case of good conduct.
My alternate account uses the hammerschlag as a near mandatory opening.
@verylate said in #45:
> Isn't bongclouding the antithesis of good conduct?
Your Honour, I object the statement by Verylate. Though the bongcloud is notoriously handicapping to its performer, it does not qualify as bad conduct. On the contrary, it should be viewed as good conduct, since the accusee would greatly enhance the odds of success of his opponent at the expense of his own, thereby doing a good service to the chess community.
> Isn't bongclouding the antithesis of good conduct?
Your Honour, I object the statement by Verylate. Though the bongcloud is notoriously handicapping to its performer, it does not qualify as bad conduct. On the contrary, it should be viewed as good conduct, since the accusee would greatly enhance the odds of success of his opponent at the expense of his own, thereby doing a good service to the chess community.
What is a bongcloud?
@Coolname5823 said in #48:
> What is a bongcloud?
1. e4 e5 2. Ke2.
It's strictly worse than the Hammerschlag, which is 1. f3! e5 2. Kf2!!!!!!!^5
> What is a bongcloud?
1. e4 e5 2. Ke2.
It's strictly worse than the Hammerschlag, which is 1. f3! e5 2. Kf2!!!!!!!^5
Your Honour, as Ombudsman I see no objection in the citizen Clousems' wishes of using the Hammerschlag in stead of the Bongcloud. Citizen @Zurel, has the honourable Jury reached a verdict?